a project of the University of Michigan Law School Program in Refugee and Asylum Law
The University of Michigan’s Program in Refugee and Asylum Law
The University of Michigan Law School offers the world’s most comprehensive program for the study of international and comparative refugee law.
Curriculum
The foundation course of the Program is International Refugee Law (Law 724), an introduction to the legal definition of a refugee codified in international law, and adopted by nearly 150 states, including the United States. After coming to an understanding of who is entitled to asylum, students may enroll in the Refugee Rights Workshop (Law 845), which explains the way in which rights are guaranteed to persons who meet the international refugee definition, allows students to identify and analyze a current situation in which refugee rights are at risk, and gives each seminar member the opportunity to devise a legal intervention strategy that draws on refugee law and other branches of international human rights law. Students completing these two offerings will have a comprehensive understanding of international refugee law, both as designed and as implemented in the practice of states.
Michigan Fellows in Refugee and Asylum Law
In addition to the formal academic curriculum, Michigan Law School students who have completed the course in International Refugee Law are eligible to compete for a Michigan Fellowship in Refugee and Asylum Law. Michigan Fellows receive a grant from the Program to cover the living and transportation costs to undertake a one-on-one summer internship (6-10 weeks) with a recognized leader in the refugee law field.
Join Our Newsletter
About RefLaw
RefLaw.org is an online forum offering critical analysis on important new cases, legislation, and emerging issues in refugee law. We publish both longer articles analyzing the implications of law or policy, as well as shorter notes on global current events that may impact refugee law. Our aim is to ...
Read MoreMust Reads
- Israeli Supreme Court on Detention of Asylum Seekers
- The Conundrum of Concealment: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v. SZSCA, [2013] FCAFC 155 (Aus. Full Federal Court, Dec. 10, 2013)
- South African Court Affirms Refugees’ Right to Self-Employment
Editorial Advisory Panel
Popular Now
- Israeli Supreme Court on Detention of Asylum Seekers
- The Conundrum of Concealment: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v. SZSCA, [2013] FCAFC 155 (Aus. Full Federal Court, Dec. 10, 2013)
- South African Court Affirms Refugees’ Right to Self-Employment
Top Law Stories
- Israeli Supreme Court on Detention of Asylum Seekers
- The Conundrum of Concealment: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v. SZSCA, [2013] FCAFC 155 (Aus. Full Federal Court, Dec. 10, 2013)
- South African Court Affirms Refugees’ Right to Self-Employment
- UNHCR Faces an RSD Crisis
- Supreme Court of Canada and “Serious Non-Political Crimes”
- Historic U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Decision Recognizes Domestic Violence and Gender as the Basis for Asylum
- No Refuge From Climate Change
- One Year after the Korean Refugee Act
- Establishing a Common European Asylum System by Leaving European Human Rights Standards Behind: Is this the Way Forward?
- “The Benefit of the Doubt” in Asylum Law
- Forced Removals to Somalia Continue in the Netherlands
- Of Shepherds and Sheepdogs – Andre Lawrence Shepherd v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland before the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Vulnerability, the Right to Asylum and the Dublin System
- Syrian Asylum Seekers Face Difficulties in Japan
- The Michigan Guidelines on Risk for Reasons of Political Opinion
- Refugee Protection for Homeschoolers? Congressional Efforts to Amend the Refugee Definition and Restrict Protection for Central American Refugees
- Privacy and Impunity in South Africa
- How to Sink a Boat: A Legal Analysis of the Right to Seek Asylum
- Uighur Refugee Dispute Sheds Light on Thai Asylum Practices
- Palestinian Refugees and the Protection Gap
- Hispaniola: A Current Stateless Issue and a Looming Refugee Crisis
- The Often Fine Line Between Asylum Seeker and Smuggler
- Moving Beyond the Asylum Muddle
- Complicity under Article 1F(a) of the 1951 Convention
- Khlaifia and Others v Italy: Italy again held in violation of collective expulsions by ECtHR
- The U.S. State Governors and the Syrian Refugees
- Expulsion of Refugees from Russia to Syria Would Violate International Obligations
- Hotspots and Relocation Schemes: The Right Therapy for the Common European Asylum System?
- Lessons from the Response of German Courts to Hungary’s Asylum Procedures
- Naturalization in Tanzania: Lessons from the Ebb and Flow of the Process
- A Global Solution to a Global Refugee Crisis
- Welcome to Denmark: How Will You Be Paying for Your Stay?
- Recasting Detention of Asylum Seekers in Bulgaria: The Good and Bad about EU Asylum Law
- Administrative Contempt: South Africa’s Refusal to Reopen the Port Elizabeth Refugee Reception Office
- The Smuggled and the Smuggler: Exploring the Distinctions Between Mutual Aid, Humanitarian Refugee Assistance and People Smuggling in Canadian Law
- Pacific Dissolution: The Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea Rejects Australia’s Refugee Deterrence Scheme
- Mental Disability and Subjective Fear in the United States
- A Really, Really Bad Month for Refugees
- The Enemy of My Enemy: European Readmission Agreements with Repressive Governments
- Protecting Refugee Property and Dignity: A Brief Comment on the Legal and Ethical Basis of the Danish “Jewelry Law”
- Norway Builds Fence Along Border with Russia to Deter Refugees and Migrants
- Let Sleeping Dogs Lie? Temporary Protection in European Union Asylum Law
- Executive (Dis)order and Refugees—The Trump Policy’s Blindness to International Law
- Nigerian Sex-Trafficking Victims and the Recognition of Refugee Status in the United Kingdom
- Denial at the Airport, Denial of Procedural Fairness: Examining the Korean Refugee Act
- A Child-Rights Framework for Understanding ‘Being Persecuted’: The Case of JA (child – risk of persecution) Nigeria
- Nationality as an Element of the Refugee Definition and the Unsettled Issues of ‘Inchoate Nationality’ and ‘Effective Nationality’
- The Negative Effects of Relying on Inconsistencies to Determine Credibility in Asylum Claims Involving an Initial Omission of Sexual Assault
- The International Non-Refoulement Obligation and a Refugee’s Non-Compliance Under the Australian Migration Act of 1958
- Understanding “Suffering,” Yet Misconstruing Intentionality: U.S. Compliance and Non-Compliance with the Convention against Torture
- One Year Later: Child Immigration Detention Continues
- Israeli Supreme Court Rules: Taxation and Employment Restrictions on Employers of “foreign workers” Apply to Employers of Asylum Seekers Too
- Protection in Word But Not in Practice: How Resettlement Countries are Failing LGBTI Refugees
- Unsafe Third Country: Greek Court Returns Syrian Refugees to Turkey
- Mexico and U.S. Still Lock Up Central American Refugees, but Make Moves Towards Ending Detention
- Merging Sociology and Law: How Social Construction of Identity May Explain Differing Treatment of Women and Gay People as Social Groups in Refugee Law
- The Inclusion of a Subjective Component in “Well-Founded Fear” and the Insufficiency of Strict Textualism
- Anti-Gang/Guerrilla Opinions are Political Opinions
- Taking Subjectivity Out of the Serious Harm Determination
- Support for Refugees with Disabilities and Other Specific Health Care Needs
- The Government’s Role in Domestic Violence: A different take on nexus formation
- Towards a Less Arbitrary Unequal: Designating Last Habitual Residence in Stateless Asylum Claims in the U.S.